Am 09.11.2010 15:42, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 12:25:47PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> @@ -417,6 +423,17 @@ static void assigned_dev_pci_write_config(PCIDevice *d, uint32_t address, >> >> if (address == 0x4) { >> pci_default_write_config(d, address, val, len); >> + pci_dev->intx_masked = val & PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE; >> +#ifdef KVM_CAP_PCI_2_3 >> + memset(&assigned_dev_data, 0, sizeof(assigned_dev_data)); >> + assigned_dev_data.assigned_dev_id = >> + calc_assigned_dev_id(pci_dev->h_segnr, pci_dev->h_busnr, >> + pci_dev->h_devfn); >> + if (pci_dev->intx_masked) { >> + assigned_dev_data.flags = KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_MASK_INTX; >> + } >> + kvm_assign_set_intx_mask(kvm_context, &assigned_dev_data); >> +#endif >> /* Continue to program the card */ >> } >> >> @@ -494,6 +511,10 @@ do_log: >> else if (address == 6) >> val &= ~0x10; >> } >> + if (address == PCI_COMMAND) { > > Could also be a single-byte write into the high byte > of this word. Yes, will fix. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html