On Tuesday 02 November 2010 15:46:11 Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 02.11.2010 08:31, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 November 2010 15:05:51 Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Obtail the new pgd pointer before releasing the page containing this
> >> value.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Who is taking care of this? The kvm tree?
> >>
> >> drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> >> index 4789f8e..35463dd 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> >> @@ -3627,9 +3627,9 @@ static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct
> >> iommu_domain *domain,
> >>
> >> pte = dmar_domain->pgd;
> >> if (dma_pte_present(pte)) {
> >>
> >> - free_pgtable_page(dmar_domain->pgd);
> >>
> >> dmar_domain->pgd = (struct dma_pte *)
> >>
> >> phys_to_virt(dma_pte_addr(pte));
> >>
> >> + free_pgtable_page(pte);
> >>
> >> }
> >> dmar_domain->agaw--;
> >>
> >> }
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > CC iommu mailing list and David.
> >
> > OK, Jan, I got your meaning now. And it's not the exactly swap. :)
> >
> > I think the old code is safe, seems it's broken(exposed) by:
> >
> > commit 1a8bd481bfba30515b54368d90a915db3faf302f
> > Author: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue Aug 10 01:38:53 2010 +0100
> >
> > intel-iommu: Fix 32-bit build warning with __cmpxchg()
> >
> > drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c: In function 'dma_pte_addr':
> > drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c:239: warning: passing argument 1 of
> > '__cmpxchg64'
> >
> > from incompatible pointer typ
> >
> > It seems that __cmpxchg64() now cares about the type of its pointer
> > argument, so give it a (uint64_t *) instead of a pointer to a
> > structure which contains only that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> > index c9171be..603cdc0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> > @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static inline u64 dma_pte_addr(struct dma_pte *pte)
> >
> > return pte->val & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
> >
> > #else
> >
> > /* Must have a full atomic 64-bit read */
> >
> > - return __cmpxchg64(pte, 0ULL, 0ULL) & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
> > + return __cmpxchg64(&pte->val, 0ULL, 0ULL) & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
> >
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > Seems here is the only affected code?
>
> CONFIG_64BIT is on here, so this change did not make a difference for me.
Oh...
Then it would due to most VT-d machine wouldn't run into while (iommu->agaw <
dmar_domain->agaw).
We have routing test for VT-d devices assignment, but seems we don't use this kind
of VT-d machine for testing.
--
regards
Yang, Sheng
>
> Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
