Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Type-safe ioport callbacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 On 10/26/2010 08:33 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>  Why two types?  I think some devices use PIO on a PC and MMIO on other
>  architectures.  Sharing the type would allow sharing code.

Then there are the functions provided by rwhandler.c. I think that
interface makes even more sense compared to 8/16/32 (and 64?) bit
handlers in many cases.

On the other hand, that makes the transition harder.

Perhaps we can have a type with {read,write}(addr, width), and another built on top that provides the traditional {read,write}[bwl](addr) to ease the transition.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux