Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] Type-safe ioport callbacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/25/2010 08:52 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 10/25/2010 03:46 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:

Should we create a Documentation/ file with incomplete transitions
and the commit(s) that introduced them, for volunteers who wish to do
some dirty work or to learn Coccinelle?

If we have a TODO, we could add a janitor section there.

That's unnecessary work.  The vast majority of the callers of
register_ioport* should be using a bus specific interface instead.

It's still an incomplete transition.

Right, but what I meant was, there's not a lot of benefit to switching callers to ioport_register() if they should be using isa_ioport_register() or whatever is the appropriate interface.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Paolo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux