Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Oct 19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/21/2010 03:14 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
I agree that some agent code for basic stuff like live snapshot
sync with the filesystem is small enough and worth to host within
qemu. Maybe we do need more than one project?

No, please. That's exactly what I don't want to see. The
libvirt/qemu/virt-man split is killing us already. How is this going
to become with 20 driver packs for the guest?

Agreed. Not relying on Mata Hari and reinventing a dbus/WMI interface would be yet another case of QEMU NIH. The same argument also works on the backend BTW, it can be virtio serial but also a Xen pvconsole and that wheel should not be reinvented either.

The guest agent should be a pluggable architecture, and QEMU can provide plugins for sync, spice, "info balloon" and everything else it needs.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux