On 10/21/2010 12:03 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
The timeout of qemu_kvm_eat_signal is always zero.
So then qemu_kvm_eat_signal purely polls and it will happily keep
polling as long as there is a signal pending.
So what's the point of doing a sigtimedwait() and dropping qemu_mutex?
I agree that keeping the qemu_mutex makes sense if you remove the
timeout argument (which I even have a patch for, as part of my Win32
iothread series). Until there is the theoretical possibility of
suspending the process, qemu_kvm_eat_signal should drop the mutex.
Why not just check sigpending in a loop?
Because sigtimedwait eats the signal, unlike sigpending (and sigsuspend).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html