On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:33:31 +0800
>> Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Add vzalloc for convinience of vmalloc-then-memset-zero case
>>>
>>> Use __GFP_ZERO in vzalloc to zero fill the allocated memory.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Âinclude/linux/vmalloc.h | Â Â1 +
>>> Âmm/vmalloc.c      Â|  13 +++++++++++++
>>> Â2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/vmalloc.h  Â2010-08-22 15:31:38.000000000 +0800
>>> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/vmalloc.h 2010-10-16 10:50:54.739996121 +0800
>>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ static inline void vmalloc_init(void)
>>> Â#endif
>>>
>>> Âextern void *vmalloc(unsigned long size);
>>> +extern void *vzalloc(unsigned long size);
>>> Âextern void *vmalloc_user(unsigned long size);
>>> Âextern void *vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, int node);
>>> Âextern void *vmalloc_exec(unsigned long size);
>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/vmalloc.c    2010-08-22 15:31:39.000000000 +0800
>>> +++ linux-2.6/mm/vmalloc.c  Â2010-10-16 10:51:57.126665918 +0800
>>> @@ -1604,6 +1604,19 @@ void *vmalloc(unsigned long size)
>>> ÂEXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc);
>>>
>>> Â/**
>>> + * Â vzalloc Â- Âallocate virtually contiguous memory with zero filled
>>
>> s/filled/fill/
>
> Thanks, Will fix
>
>>
>>> + * Â @size: Â Â Â Â Âallocation size
>>> + * Â Allocate enough pages to cover @size from the page level
>>> + * Â allocator and map them into contiguous kernel virtual space.
>>> + */
>>> +void *vzalloc(unsigned long size)
>>> +{
>>> + Â Â return __vmalloc_node(size, 1, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_ZERO,
>>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â PAGE_KERNEL, -1, __builtin_return_address(0));
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vzalloc);
>>
>> We'd need to add the same interface to nommu, please.
>
> Ok, will do
>
> Minchan kim, thanks as well. I missed your comments about nommu before.
>
>>
>> Also, a slightly better implementation would be
>>
>> static inline void *__vmalloc_node_flags(unsigned long size, gfp_t flags)
>> {
>> Â Â Â Âreturn __vmalloc_node(size, 1, flags, PAGE_KERNEL, -1,
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â__builtin_return_address(0));
>> }
Is this better? might __vmalloc_node_flags would be used by other than vmalloc?
static inline void *__vmalloc_node_flags(unsigned long size, int node,
gfp_t flags)
>>
>> void *vzalloc(unsigned long size)
>> {
>> Â Â Â Âreturn __vmalloc_node_flags(size,
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ÂGFP_KERNEL | __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_ZERO);
>> }
>>
>> void *vmalloc(unsigned long size)
>> {
>> Â Â Â Âreturn __vmalloc_node_flags(size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
>> }
>>
>> just to avoid code duplication (and possible later errors derived from it).
>>
>> Perhaps it should be always_inline, so the __builtin_return_address()
>> can't get broken.
>>
>> Or just leave it the way you had it :)
>
> Andrew, your suggestion is cleaner and better. I will do as yours.
>
> --
> Regards
> dave
>
--
Regards
dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
