On 10/17/2010 12:05 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
This patch allows a guest to use the VMXON and VMXOFF instructions, and
emulates them accordingly. Basically this amounts to checking some
prerequisites, and then remembering whether the guest has enabled or disabled
VMX operation.
+/*
+ * Emulate the VMXON instruction.
+ * Currently, we just remember that VMX is active, and do not save or even
+ * inspect the argument to VMXON (the so-called "VMXON pointer") because we
+ * do not currently need to store anything in that guest-allocated memory
+ * region. Consequently, VMCLEAR and VMPTRLD also do not verify that the their
+ * argument is different from the VMXON pointer (which the spec says they do).
+ */
+static int handle_vmon(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm_segment cs;
+ struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
+
+ /* The Intel VMX Instruction Reference lists a bunch of bits that
+ * are prerequisite to running VMXON, most notably CR4.VMXE must be
+ * set to 1. Otherwise, we should fail with #UD. We test these now:
+ */
+ if (!nested ||
Is the !nested case needed? Presumably cr4.vmxe will be clear is !nested.
+ !kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_VMXE) ||
+ !kvm_read_cr0_bits(vcpu, X86_CR0_PE) ||
+ (vmx_get_rflags(vcpu)& X86_EFLAGS_VM)) {
+ kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ vmx_get_segment(vcpu,&cs, VCPU_SREG_CS);
+ if (is_long_mode(vcpu)&& !cs.l) {
+ kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ if (vmx_get_cpl(vcpu)) {
+ kvm_inject_gp(vcpu, 0);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ vmx->nested.vmxon = true;
+
+ skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
+ return 1;
+}
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
