Re: 2.6.35-rc1 regression with pvclock and smp guests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-10-09 04:27, Zachary Amsden wrote:
...
> There's a lot of work I've done and also a lot of work done by Glauber
> Costa on kvmclock that recently went upstream.
> 
> It's unlikely that you'll be bug free without all of those patches
> applied; most of the patches were not just enhancements, but contained
> bugfixes as well as improved operation conditions.  On top of this, the
> patches are highly interdependent because of close code proximity.  I
> suggest applying the following commits to your branch (newest listed
> first; apply in reverse order):
> 
> 12b1164fa498997bf72070e6a81418197e283716
...
> 3e05d29fe45508625e2a73db3d1bfb54f30731ff

I've tried applying these commits to 2.6.32.24, but gave up after a
while, because some were just too different to make it work (e.g.
91308e2fecddb6fc63feaf4cef3400f5cbea6619).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux