On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 07:12 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Yes, I agree this patch is useful for demo purposes: > simple, and shows what kind of performance gains > we can expect for TX. Any other issue you can see in this patch beside vhost descriptors update? Don't you think once I address vhost_add_used_and_signal update issue, it is a simple and complete patch for macvtap TX zero copy? Thanks Shirley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
