Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Add a new API to virtio-pci

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/13/2010 04:04 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:50:42AM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
"Michael S. Tsirkin"<mst@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote on 09/12/2010 05:16:37 PM:

"Michael S. Tsirkin"<mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
09/12/2010 05:16 PM

On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 07:19:33PM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Unfortunately I need a
constant in vhost for now.
Maybe not even that: you create multiple vhost-net
devices so vhost-net in kernel does not care about these
either, right? So this can be just part of vhost_net.h
in qemu.
Sorry, I didn't understand what you meant.

I can remove all socks[] arrays/constants by pre-allocating
sockets in vhost_setup_vqs. Then I can remove all "socks"
parameters in vhost_net_stop, vhost_net_release and
vhost_net_reset_owner.

Does this make sense?

Thanks,

- KK
Here's what I mean: each vhost device includes 1 TX
and 1 RX VQ. Instead of teaching vhost about multiqueue,
we could simply open /dev/vhost-net multiple times.
How many times would be up to qemu.

Trouble is, each vhost-net device is associated with 1 tun/tap device which means that each vhost-net device is associated with a transmit and receive queue.

I don't know if you'll always have an equal number of transmit and receive queues but there's certainly challenge in terms of flexibility with this model.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux