On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:01:28AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 09/12/2010 09:16 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> Either way, I don't think we need a phenom2 type. The features >> additional are minor enough to not really matter and all use cases I >> can come up with require either -cpu host (local virt) or -cpu phenom >> (migration). > > I'm fine with this (or with adding phenom2). But don't make phenom > contain flags that real phenoms don't have. How about features that are not supported by the hardware but can be supported in emulation? The VMCBCLEAN feature is one of those which makes a lot of sense to reduce the emulated world-switch times. I guess its ok to enable those with -cpu host? Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
