Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Michael,

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 09/08/2010 01:43:26 PM:

> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:58:59PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> > 1. mq RX patch is also complete - plan to submit once TX is OK.
>
> It's good that you split patches, I think it would be interesting to see
> the RX patches at least once to complete the picture.
> You could make it a separate patchset, tag them as RFC.

OK, I need to re-do some parts of it, since I started the TX only
branch a couple of weeks earlier and the RX side is outdated. I
will try to send that out in the next couple of days, as you say
it will help to complete the picture. Reasons to send it only TX
now:

- Reduce size of patch and complexity
- I didn't get much improvement on multiple RX patch (netperf from
  host -> guest), so needed some time to figure out the reason and
  fix it.

Thanks,

- KK

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux