Re: [PATCH] KVM: don't sent IPI if the vcpu is not online

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06.09.2010, at 11:14, Avi Kivity wrote:

> On 09/06/2010 12:09 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> 
>>> It can also be running host kernel or user code.
>> In that case it's the same as running guest code, no? We'll pass by the vcpu entry check asap.
> 
> Sure, but the IPI is wasted.  If you spend 10% of your time in host code, you can avoid 10% of the IPIs.
> 
> (actually less, since the atomic part of the guest switch has guest_mode enabled)

Oh. My bad. I had a thinko here :).

Sure, sounds like a good idea.


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux