On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 12:07 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > My comments were mostly because I though that this patch was going to > actually make the scheduler change behaviour to take stolen time into > account in scheduling decisions - and those decisions would be equally > meaningful if the slowdown was from HT, PM or stolen time. But AFAICT > this patch does nothing to that end. If you want to influence the load-balancer (the only thing that really cares about HT) the best would probably be to add a term to kernel/sched_fair.c:update_cpu_power(). Decrease the power relative to the amount of steal-time, just like freq and time spend on RT tasks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
