On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:33:26AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 08/30/2010 09:06 AM, Glauber Costa wrote: > > With a reliable steal time mechanism, we can tell if we're > > out of the cpu for very long, differentiating from the case > > that we simply got a real softlockup. > > > > In the case we were out of cpu, the watchdog is fed, making > > bogus softlockups disappear. > > Why not change the softlockup to measure unstolen time rather than > explicitly poking it from a hypervisor-specific function? > Ok, I like your idea much better. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
