Re: [KVM timekeeping 12/35] Robust TSC compensation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/20/2010 07:40 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:07:26PM -1000, Zachary Amsden wrote:
Make the match of TSC find TSC writes that are close to each other
instead of perfectly identical; this allows the compensator to also
work in migration / suspend scenarios.

Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden<zamsden@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |   14 ++++++++++----
  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 52680f6..0f3e5fb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -928,21 +928,27 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data)
  	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
  	u64 offset, ns, elapsed;
  	unsigned long flags;
+	s64 sdiff;

  	spin_lock_irqsave(&kvm->arch.tsc_write_lock, flags);
  	offset = data - native_read_tsc();
  	ns = get_kernel_ns();
  	elapsed = ns - kvm->arch.last_tsc_nsec;
+	sdiff = data - kvm->arch.last_tsc_write;
+	if (sdiff<  0)
+		sdiff = -sdiff;

  	/*
-	 * Special case: identical write to TSC within 5 seconds of
+	 * Special case: close write to TSC within 5 seconds of
  	 * another CPU is interpreted as an attempt to synchronize
-	 * (the 5 seconds is to accomodate host load / swapping).
+	 * The 5 seconds is to accomodate host load / swapping as
+	 * well as any reset of TSC during the boot process.
  	 *
  	 * In that case, for a reliable TSC, we can match TSC offsets,
-	 * or make a best guest using kernel_ns value.
+	 * or make a best guest using elapsed value.
  	 */
-	if (data == kvm->arch.last_tsc_write&&  elapsed<  5ULL * NSEC_PER_SEC) {
+	if (sdiff<  nsec_to_cycles(5ULL * NSEC_PER_SEC)&&
+	    elapsed<  5ULL * NSEC_PER_SEC) {
  		if (!check_tsc_unstable()) {
Isn't 5 way too long for this case?



It was actually too short for a while, and I didn't realize why until I discovered on SVM, the APs were getting the TSC reset after the startup IPI.

In any case, the value is certainly up for debate. I chose a large number because who knows how badly things can get off in the case of host overcommit / swapping.

Zach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux