On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:37:23AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> Thanks for your review and sorry for the delay reply.
>
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> >> +static struct kvm_memory_slot *
> >> +pte_prefetch_gfn_to_memslot(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, bool no_dirty_log)
> >> +{
> >> + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> >> +
> >> + slot = gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
> >> + if (!slot || slot->flags & KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID ||
> >> + (no_dirty_log && slot->dirty_bitmap))
> >> + slot = NULL;
> >
> > Why is this no_dirty_log optimization worthwhile?
> >
>
> We disable prefetch the writable pages since 'pte prefetch' will hurt slot's
> dirty page tracking that it set the dirty_bitmap bit but the corresponding page
> is not really accessed.
>
> >> +
> >> + return slot;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static pfn_t pte_prefetch_gfn_to_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
> >> + bool no_dirty_log)
> >> +{
> >> + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> >> + unsigned long hva;
> >> +
> >> + slot = pte_prefetch_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, gfn, no_dirty_log);
> >> + if (!slot) {
> >> + get_page(bad_page);
> >> + return page_to_pfn(bad_page);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + hva = gfn_to_hva_memslot(slot, gfn);
> >> +
> >> + return hva_to_pfn_atomic(vcpu->kvm, hva);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int direct_pte_prefetch_many(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> + struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
> >> + u64 *start, u64 *end)
> >> +{
> >> + struct page *pages[PTE_PREFETCH_NUM];
> >> + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> >> + unsigned hva, access = sp->role.access;
> >> + int i, ret, npages = end - start;
> >> + gfn_t gfn;
> >> +
> >> + gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, start - sp->spt);
> >> + slot = pte_prefetch_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, gfn, access & ACC_WRITE_MASK);
> >> + if (!slot || slot->npages - (gfn - slot->base_gfn) != npages)
> >> + return -1;
> >> +
> >> + hva = gfn_to_hva_memslot(slot, gfn);
> >> + ret = __get_user_pages_fast(hva, npages, 1, pages);
> >> + if (ret <= 0)
> >> + return -1;
> >
> > Better do one at a time with hva_to_pfn_atomic. Or, if you measure that
> > its worthwhile, do on a separate patch (using a helper as discussed
> > previously).
> >
>
> Since it should disable 'prefetch' for the writable pages, so i'm not put these
> operations into a common function and define it in kvm_main.c file.
>
> Maybe we do better do these in a wrap function named pte_prefetch_gfn_to_pages()?
Yes, please have it as a common function in kvm_main.c.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
