Re: [Qemu-devel] Anyone seeing huge slowdown launching qemu with Linux 2.6.35?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/04/2010 04:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:54:35AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
  On 08/04/2010 01:06 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:24:41PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Why do we need to transfer roms?  These are devices on the memory
bus or pci bus, it just needs to be there at the right address.
Boot splash should just be another rom as it would be on a real
system.
Just like the initrd?
There isn't enough address space for a 100MB initrd in ROM.
Because of limits of the original PC, sure, where you had to fit
everything in 0xa0000-0xfffff or whatever it was.

But this isn't a real PC.

You can map the read-only memory anywhere you want.

It's not that simple. Option roms are initialized in 16-bit mode so the physical address space is limited. The address mappings have very well defined semantics.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Rich.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux