Re: [Qemu-devel] Anyone seeing huge slowdown launching qemu with Linux 2.6.35?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 On 08/03/2010 10:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 09:43:39PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
libguestfs does not depend on an x86 architectural feature.
qemu-system-x86_64 emulates a PC, and PCs don't have -kernel.  We
should discourage people from depending on this interface for
production use.
I really don't get this whole thing where we must slavishly
emulate an exact PC ...

This has two motivations:

- documented interfaces: we suck at documentation. We seldom document. Even when we do document something, the documentation is often inaccurate, misleading, and incomplete. While an "exact PC" unfortunately doesn't exist, it's a lot closer to reality than, say, an "exact Linux syscall interface". If we adopt an existing interface, we already have the documentation, and if there's a conflict between the documentation and our implementation, it's clear who wins (well, not always).

- preexisting guests: if we design a new interface, we get to update all guests; and there are many of them. Whereas an "exact PC" will be seen by the guest vendors as well who will then add whatever support is necessary.

Obviously we break this when we have to, but we don't, we shouldn't.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux