On 07/26/2010 06:51 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Just one more thing. > > I noticed that with vhost, flush_work was getting the worker > pointer as well. Can we live with this API change? Yeah, the flushing mechanism wouldn't work reliably if the work is queued to a different worker without flushing, so yeah passing in @worker might actually be better. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
