It's a pitty I can't easily attend to this conference call, as it seems a lot of decisions are taken there. Anyway let me comment the part concerning 0.12 stable: On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 07:45:51AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > 0.12.stable > - start w/ git tree + pull requests > - release process is separate from commit access > - justin will put up a tree for pull requests > - there's current backlog, what about that? I think someone should actively follow the patches committed to HEAD and backport them when they seems to be stable material. I guess it's what's Justin plans to do. OTOH, it might be useful if people sending patches to HEAD adds a small comment about cherry-picking the patch to stable if it applies. > - anthony's concern with -stable is the testing (upstream tree gets more > testing than -stable) Debian gets regular uploads with the contents of the -stable tree between to releases. Also patches from trunk are all cherry-picked from HEAD. > - 0.12.5? > - planning to do next w/ 0.13 release > - aurelien may cut a release Following the minutes from last week, I sent a call for release, with a deadline today. I only got the patch series from Kevin. There are currently 44 patches waiting in the stable tree, so I guess we can go for a release. I plan to do that later this week if nobody opposes. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.aurel32.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
