Re: KVM timekeeping fixes, V2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/16/2010 03:19 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:25:20PM -1000, Zachary Amsden wrote:
Discovered brammage in patches due to unresolved merge.
Also, had to move 09/18 past 08/18 to resolve compile issue.
Have you tested this patchset with Nested SVM? We had TSC handling
related bugs there in the past and should make sure to keep it working.

I've been very careful to keep nested SVM safe, but I've not got a good test for that. Is there any test suite for the nested case?

It took a lot of guessing to figure out why it works and why the code looks imbalanced, but I now understand the way it is now is logical and correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux