| From: Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 05:53 pm | | On Wednesday 14 July 2010 04:41:01 Casey Leedom wrote: | > | > It looks like the Linux KVM kernel support code issues an FLR against | > an Assigned Device when the device is assigned and when it's freed | > but it's not clear when those actions are taken. For instance, | > if a device is assigned to a VM and then the VM reboots itself, is | > that counted as another assignment point? I.e. will KVM issue a | > new pci_reset_function() on the device so it shows up reset in | > the newly rebooted VM? | | The assignment/deassignment happened when guest was created/destroyed. | Currently it wouldn't issue a FLR when guest reset. Hhrrmmm, this seems like a semantic error. "Resetting" the Vm should be morally equivalent to resetting a real physical machine. And when a real physical machine is reset, all of its buses, etc. get reset which propagates to Device Resets on those buses ... I think that Assigned Devices should be reset for reboots and power off/on ... | > And what happens if the VM OS/Driver attempts to write the PCI Pass | > Through Device's PCI-E FLR bit? I assume that that write (and the | > following polling reads) are trapped by the KVM code but I can't find the | > code which implements the PCI Configuration Space emulation to see if the | > FLR is implemented there. For instance, if I run Linux 2.6.30 in the VM | > and my Device Driver calls pci_reset_function() in its "probe()" function | > will that result in a Device FLR? it doesn't appear to be the case ... | | The PCI configuration space emulated is in QEmu rather than KVM. You can | check qemu-kvm/hw/device-assignment.c. We didn't emulate FLR capability | now. (OK, some other device specific reset method may involved, you can | check pci_dev_reset()) Okay, I think that this is also going to be an issue for supporting Assigned Devices. For PCI-E SR-IOV Virtual Functions which are assigned to a VM, they need to be reset at reboot/power off/power on and the Configuration Space emulation needs to support the Guest OS/VM Device Driver issuing an FLR ... | > Note that it's impossible for a Device Driver to call | > pci_reset_function() under Linux 2.6.31 and later | > because a call to device_lock() was added to | > pci_dev_reset() in chageset 8e9394ce on Feb | > 17, 2010 by Greg Kroah-Hartman. This means | > that a call to pci_reset_function() in a device | > driver's "probe()" routine will result in an | > immediate deadlock. | | What I saw the code is like this: | | static int pci_dev_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe) | { | int rc; | | might_sleep(); | | if (!probe) { | pci_block_user_cfg_access(dev); | /* block PM suspend, driver probe, etc. */ | device_lock(&dev->dev); | } | [...] | | So seems it's fine with _probe_ set, to use with probe() routine. You're looking at a local routine in drivers/pci/pci.c. That routine is called twice in pci_reset_function(). The "probe" parameter is used to indicate whether the caller wants to "probe" for the ability to perform a PCI Function Reset or to actually _do_ the reset. pci_reset_function() first calls pci_dev_reset() is probe=1 and, if that returns an error code, it returns immediately with the error. Otherwise it saves the PCI State of the device, makes another call to pci_dev_reset() with probe=0, and then restores the device's PCI State. Thus, this "probe" in pci_dev_reset() doesn't have anything to do with the possibility that a device's own (pci_dev *)->driver->probe() routine happens to be calling pci_reset_function(). Since, apparently, the device's own ...->probe() routine is called with the device's (pci_dev *)->lock held, a call to pci_reset_function() on itself will result in an immediate deadlock from Linux 2.6.31 on ... Casey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html