Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/13/2010 07:25 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:

Regressions? no.  Or do you mean the problem already exists?  Where?
I mean this is a exist problem, likes invlpg, pte-write and sync-page, there are
speculative path that it's not real access, but marked dirty if pte is writable.

Right.  We should fix those too.

Prefetch is much more worrying though, especially with ept. If a guest is using just 1/8 of the pages, it can look to migration as if it's using 100% of the pages. The impact can be pretty large.

In contrast, I'm not too worried about invlpg, as most times an access will follow a miss, and usually a write access if we set a writeable pte. Not sure about sync-page.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux