On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 08:50:58AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> >> - if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && !is_large_pte(*sptep))
> >> - continue;
> >> + if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && !is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
> >> + struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
> >> + unsigned direct_access;
> >> +
> >> + if (level != gw->level)
> >> + continue;
> >
> > This will skip the check for the sp at level 1 when emulating 1GB pages
> > with 4k host pages (where there are direct sp's at level 2 and 1).
> > Should be > instead of !=.
> >
>
> Marcelo,
>
> I think the patch is right.
>
> Every level's direct sp has the same access in the mapping since while we setup the
> mapping we find the direct sp with the same access.
> (Note: we have encode the D bit to the sp->role.access)
>
> Consider guest 1G writable clean pages and host 4K pages, the shadow pages mapping
> is like this:
>
> indirect L4 --> indirect L3 --> direct ReadOnly L2 --> direct ReadOnly L1
>
> When change guest pte to dirty, we update L3' spte and find the direct writable L2 sp,
> assume it's A, then we can sure that A's children sps should also writable, the final
> mapping is like this:
>
> indirect L4 --> indirect L3 --> direct Writable L2 --> direct Writable L1.
>
> So, i think we not broken anything in this patch :-)
You're right. Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
