On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:25:16PM +0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> It would buy us the ability to schedule compared to smp_call_function().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> But I am not sure if it worth the complexity. Anyway WBINVD itself can't be
> interrupted, so the benefit should come to the caller cpu I think. And that
> would extended the waiting time for the caller cpu, for we still need to wait
> other cpus to complete their works.
Alright, can be done later in case it shows to be necessary.
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 2bda624..6e0b793 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
> #include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> #include <linux/kvm.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_para.h>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index eea75f5..13f7c88 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ struct kvm_stats_debugfs_item debugfs_entries[] = {
>
> u64 __read_mostly host_xcr0;
>
> +static struct workqueue_struct *wbinvd_wq;
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, wbinvd_work);
> +
> static inline u32 bit(int bitno)
> {
> return 1 << (bitno & 31);
> @@ -1783,7 +1786,7 @@ out:
> return r;
> }
>
> -static void wbinvd_ipi(void *garbage)
> +static void wbinvd_do_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> wbinvd();
> }
> @@ -1800,9 +1803,11 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
> if (need_emulate_wbinvd(vcpu)) {
> if (kvm_x86_ops->has_wbinvd_exit())
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, vcpu->arch.wbinvd_dirty_mask);
> - else if (vcpu->cpu != -1 && vcpu->cpu != cpu)
> - smp_call_function_single(vcpu->cpu,
> - wbinvd_ipi, NULL, 1);
> + else if (vcpu->cpu != -1 && vcpu->cpu != cpu) {
> + queue_work_on(vcpu->cpu, wbinvd_wq,
> + &per_cpu(wbinvd_work, vcpu->cpu));
> + flush_workqueue(wbinvd_wq);
> + }
Can't schedule here since preemption must be disabled during vcpu_load.
> }
>
> kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu);
> @@ -3672,12 +3677,16 @@ int emulate_invlpg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t address)
>
> int kvm_emulate_wbinvd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> + int cpu;
> +
> if (!need_emulate_wbinvd(vcpu))
> return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
>
> if (kvm_x86_ops->has_wbinvd_exit()) {
> - smp_call_function_many(vcpu->arch.wbinvd_dirty_mask,
> - wbinvd_ipi, NULL, 1);
> + for_each_cpu(cpu, vcpu->arch.wbinvd_dirty_mask)
> + queue_work_on(cpu, wbinvd_wq,
> + &per_cpu(wbinvd_work, cpu));
> + flush_workqueue(wbinvd_wq);
> cpumask_clear(vcpu->arch.wbinvd_dirty_mask);
> }
> wbinvd();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
