Re: Where is the entry of hypercalls in kvm?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/30/2010 03:56 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 30.06.2010, at 10:17, Peter Teoh wrote:

Your questioned is answered here:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg37526.html

And check this paper out:

http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/virtio-spec/virtio-paper.pdf

The general concept to remember is that QEMU and KVM just execute the
input as binary stream....it does not know what "functions" it is
executing...so the binary stream can be any OS (windows / Linux
etc)....QEMU just setup the basic block (call basic blocks
translation) mechanism, and then execute it block by block.   Each
block by definition is demarcated by a branch/jump etc.   Within the
block if there is any privilege instruction, (eg, write MSR registers,
load LDT registers etc), then a transition will be made from guest in
QEMU into KVM to update the VMCB/VMCS information.   (these terms are
from Intel/AMD manual).
Eh, no.

There are two modes of operation:

1) TCG
2) KVM

In mode 1, qemu goes through target-xxx/translate.c and converts the basic blocks you were talking about above to native machine code on the host system using tcg (see the tcg directory). No KVM is involved, everything happens in user mode.

In mode 2, qemu executes _everything_ by calling KVM. There is no guest code interpreted, looked at or whatever in qemu.

Only because there is a mini-x86 interpreter in the kernel. That lets KVM expose an idealized interface to qemu that requires no instruction interpretation.

More to the point of the original question, virtio is typically implemented on top of an emulated PCI device. The kick operation is implemented as a write to a PCI IO region that's mapped to PIO. If you look at hw/virtio-pci.c, you'll see the entry points.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

  Whenever the guest CPU runs, it runs because qemu called ioctrl(VCPU_RUN) on its kvm vcpu fd.

I have not seen any IOCTL calls in QEMU,
See kvm*.c and target-xxx/kvm.c

but I suspect ultimately it
should drop to a VMRUN (for AMD, Intel called it VMLAUNCH or VMRESUME)
calls inside KVM, which can be found here:

arch/x86/kvm/

And the AMD specific virtualization is done in svm.c whereas that of
vmx.c is for Intel.

Copying the remark in vmx.c:

/*
* The exit handlers return 1 if the exit was handled fully and guest execution
* may resume.  Otherwise they set the kvm_run parameter to indicate what needs
* to be done to userspace and return 0.
*/
static int (*kvm_vmx_exit_handlers[])(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) = {
        [EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_

And after reading the Intel manual, u will understand that "exit" here
actually refers to the special set of privilege intel instructions,
which upon being executed by the guest OS, will immediately caused and
VMEXIT condition, and these are handled by the above handler in
kvm.ko.
in kvm-xxx.ko for x86.

Also, please don't top post :)


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux