Re: [PATCH v2 8/10] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 08:07:06PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Support prefetch ptes when intercept guest #PF, avoid to #PF by later
> access
> 
> If we meet any failure in the prefetch path, we will exit it and
> not try other ptes to avoid become heavy path
> 
> Note: this speculative will mark page become dirty but it not really
> accessed, the same issue is in other speculative paths like invlpg,
> pte write, fortunately, it just affect host memory management. After
> Avi's patchset named "[PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: MMU: Introduce drop_spte()"
> merged, we will easily fix it. Will do it in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c         |   69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h |   74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 6c06666..b2ad723 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ module_param(oos_shadow, bool, 0644);
>  	}
>  #endif
>  
> +#define PTE_PREFETCH_NUM	16
> +
>  #define PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT 9
>  #define PT64_SECOND_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT 52
>  
> @@ -1998,6 +2000,72 @@ static void nonpaging_new_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  }
>  
> +static int direct_pte_prefetch_many(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +				    struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
> +				    u64 *start, u64 *end)
> +{
> +	gfn_t gfn;
> +	struct page *pages[PTE_PREFETCH_NUM];
> +
> +	if (pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache(vcpu, end - start))
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	gfn = sp->gfn + start - sp->spt;
> +	while (start < end) {
> +		unsigned long addr;
> +		int entry, j, ret;
> +
> +		addr = gfn_to_hva_many(vcpu->kvm, gfn, &entry);
> +		if (kvm_is_error_hva(addr))
> +			return -1;
> +
> +		entry = min(entry, (int)(end - start));
> +		ret = __get_user_pages_fast(addr, entry, 1, pages);
> +		if (ret <= 0)
> +			return -1;
> +
> +		for (j = 0; j < ret; j++, gfn++, start++)
> +			mmu_set_spte(vcpu, start, ACC_ALL,
> +				     sp->role.access, 0, 0, 1, NULL,
> +				     sp->role.level, gfn,
> +				     page_to_pfn(pages[j]), true, false);
> +
> +		if (ret < entry)
> +			return -1;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void direct_pte_prefetch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
> +	u64 *start = NULL;
> +	int index, i, max;
> +
> +	sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
> +	WARN_ON(!sp->role.direct);
> +
> +	if (sp->role.level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
> +		return;
> +
> +	index = sptep - sp->spt;
> +	i = index & ~(PTE_PREFETCH_NUM - 1);
> +	max = index | (PTE_PREFETCH_NUM - 1);
> +
> +	for (; i < max; i++) {
> +		u64 *spte = sp->spt + i;
> +
> +		if (*spte != shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte || spte == sptep) {
> +			if (!start)
> +				continue;
> +			if (direct_pte_prefetch_many(vcpu, sp, start, spte) < 0)
> +				break;
> +			start = NULL;
> +		} else if (!start)
> +			start = spte;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
>  			int level, gfn_t gfn, pfn_t pfn)
>  {
> @@ -2012,6 +2080,7 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
>  				     0, write, 1, &pt_write,
>  				     level, gfn, pfn, false, true);
>  			++vcpu->stat.pf_fixed;
> +			direct_pte_prefetch(vcpu, iterator.sptep);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> index fdba751..134f031 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> @@ -291,6 +291,79 @@ static void FNAME(update_pte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
>  		     gpte_to_gfn(gpte), pfn, true, true);
>  }
>  
> +static void FNAME(pte_prefetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
> +	pt_element_t gptep[PTE_PREFETCH_NUM];
> +	gpa_t first_pte_gpa;
> +	int offset = 0, index, i, j, max;
> +
> +	sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
> +	index = sptep - sp->spt;
> +
> +	if (sp->role.level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (sp->role.direct)
> +		return direct_pte_prefetch(vcpu, sptep);

Can never happen.

> +
> +	index = sptep - sp->spt;
> +	i = index & ~(PTE_PREFETCH_NUM - 1);
> +	max = index | (PTE_PREFETCH_NUM - 1);
> +
> +	if (PTTYPE == 32)
> +		offset = sp->role.quadrant << PT64_LEVEL_BITS;
> +
> +	first_pte_gpa = gfn_to_gpa(sp->gfn) +
> +				(offset + i) * sizeof(pt_element_t);
> +
> +	if (kvm_read_guest_atomic(vcpu->kvm, first_pte_gpa, gptep,
> +					sizeof(gptep)) < 0)
> +		return;
> +
> +	for (j = 0; i < max; i++, j++) {
> +		pt_element_t gpte;
> +		unsigned pte_access;
> +		u64 *spte = sp->spt + i;
> +		gfn_t gfn;
> +		pfn_t pfn;
> +
> +		if (spte == sptep)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (*spte != shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		gpte = gptep[j];
> +
> +		if (is_rsvd_bits_set(vcpu, gpte, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL))
> +			break;
> +
> +		if (!(gpte & PT_ACCESSED_MASK))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (!is_present_gpte(gpte)) {
> +			if (!sp->unsync)
> +				__set_spte(spte, shadow_notrap_nonpresent_pte);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		gfn = gpte_to_gfn(gpte);
> +
> +		pfn = gfn_to_pfn_atomic(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
> +		if (is_error_pfn(pfn) ||
> +			pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache(vcpu, 1)) {
> +			kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		pte_access = sp->role.access & FNAME(gpte_access)(vcpu, gpte);
> +		mmu_set_spte(vcpu, spte, sp->role.access, pte_access, 0, 0,
> +			     is_dirty_gpte(gpte), NULL, sp->role.level, gfn,
> +			     pfn, true, false);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Fetch a shadow pte for a specific level in the paging hierarchy.
>   */
> @@ -322,6 +395,7 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
>  				     user_fault, write_fault,
>  				     dirty, ptwrite, level,
>  				     gw->gfn, pfn, false, true);
> +			FNAME(pte_prefetch)(vcpu, sptep);
>  			break;
>  		}


I'm afraid this can introduce regressions since it increases mmu_lock
contention. Can you get some numbers with 4-vcpu or 8-vcpu guest and
many threads benchmarks, such as kernbench and apachebench? (on
non-EPT).

Also prefetch should be disabled for EPT, due to lack of accessed bit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux