On 11/3/25 16:05, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 7/3/25 22:56, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouvier@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/hw/hyperv/hyperv.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/hw/hyperv/hyperv.h b/include/hw/hyperv/hyperv.h
index d717b4e13d4..63a8b65278f 100644
--- a/include/hw/hyperv/hyperv.h
+++ b/include/hw/hyperv/hyperv.h
@@ -10,7 +10,8 @@
#ifndef HW_HYPERV_HYPERV_H
#define HW_HYPERV_HYPERV_H
-#include "cpu-qom.h"
+#include "exec/hwaddr.h"
+#include "hw/core/cpu.h"
I don't see where "hw/core/cpu.h" is used.
OK found it:
static inline uint32_t hyperv_vp_index(CPUState *cs)
{
return cs->cpu_index;
}
First, bringing this huge header for this single use is way overkill,
then I doubt this method deserves to be inlined, third @cpu_index is
an accelerator specific field, often incorrectly used. Maybe in this
case it is OK although, since IIUC we only support HyperV with KVM,
right?
