Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: block KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS if guest state is protected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/6/2025 9:29 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS does not make sense for VMs with protected guest state,
since the register values cannot actually be written.  Return 0
when using the VM-level KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION ioctl, and accordingly
return -EINVAL from KVM_RUN if the valid/dirty fields are nonzero.

However, on exit from KVM_RUN userspace could have placed a nonzero
value into kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs, so check guest_state_protected
again and skip store_regs() in that case.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@xxxxxxx>

Also, boot tested a SNP guest on 6.14-rc5 host with the patch applied.

Thanks,
Pankaj
---
  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 15 +++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index aaa067b79095..b416eec5c167 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -4586,6 +4586,11 @@ static bool kvm_is_vm_type_supported(unsigned long type)
  	return type < 32 && (kvm_caps.supported_vm_types & BIT(type));
  }
+static inline u32 kvm_sync_valid_fields(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	return kvm && kvm->arch.has_protected_state ? 0 : KVM_SYNC_X86_VALID_FIELDS;
+}
+
  int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
  {
  	int r = 0;
@@ -4694,7 +4699,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
  		break;
  #endif
  	case KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS:
-		r = KVM_SYNC_X86_VALID_FIELDS;
+		r = kvm_sync_valid_fields(kvm);
  		break;
  	case KVM_CAP_ADJUST_CLOCK:
  		r = KVM_CLOCK_VALID_FLAGS;
@@ -11503,6 +11508,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  {
  	struct kvm_queued_exception *ex = &vcpu->arch.exception;
  	struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
+	u32 sync_valid_fields;
  	int r;
r = kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(vcpu->kvm);
@@ -11548,8 +11554,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  		goto out;
  	}
- if ((kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_X86_VALID_FIELDS) ||
-	    (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & ~KVM_SYNC_X86_VALID_FIELDS)) {
+	sync_valid_fields = kvm_sync_valid_fields(vcpu->kvm);
+	if ((kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs & ~sync_valid_fields) ||
+	    (kvm_run->kvm_dirty_regs & ~sync_valid_fields)) {
  		r = -EINVAL;
  		goto out;
  	}
@@ -11607,7 +11614,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
out:
  	kvm_put_guest_fpu(vcpu);
-	if (kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs)
+	if (kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs && likely(!vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected))
  		store_regs(vcpu);
  	post_kvm_run_save(vcpu);
  	kvm_vcpu_srcu_read_unlock(vcpu);





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux