> > + if (has_pmu_cap && !X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) { > > One nit, it's safer to use > > (has_pmu_cap & KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE) && !X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu > > Maybe we can rename has_pmu_cap to pmu_cap as well. Yes, I agree. Regards, Zhao
> > + if (has_pmu_cap && !X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) { > > One nit, it's safer to use > > (has_pmu_cap & KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE) && !X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu > > Maybe we can rename has_pmu_cap to pmu_cap as well. Yes, I agree. Regards, Zhao
![]() |