Re: [PATCH net-next v7 5/6] selftest: tun: Add tests for virtio-net hashing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2025/02/28 23:29, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:58:51 +0900 Akihiko Odaki wrote:
The added tests confirm tun can perform RSS and hash reporting, and
reject invalid configurations for them.

The tests may benefit from using FIXTURE_VARIANT(), up to you.

I took a look at it after seeing your suggestion, but it is unfortunately not straightfoward to use FIXTURE_VARIANT() for them so I'll leave it as is. The problem is that a packet for each test has a different type and requires different functions to construct.

Tests added in "[PATCH net-next v7 4/6] selftest: tun: Test vnet ioctls without device" are easier to adopt FIXTURE_VARIANT(), but one exceptional test case, which is for TUNGETVNETHASHCAP, does not fit well so I also keep the current form.

Thank you for your suggestion anyway.


The IPv4 tests fail reliably on a VM with a debug kernel
(kernel/configs/debug.config included in the config):

# 5.90 [+0.00] ok 14 tun_vnet_hash.unclassified
# 5.90 [+0.00] #  RUN           tun_vnet_hash.ipv4 ...
# 6.18 [+0.28] # tun.c:669:ipv4:Expected 0 (0) != tun_vnet_hash_check(self->source_fd, self->dest_fds, &packet, sizeof(packet), 0, VIRTIO_NET_HASH_REPORT_IPv4, 0x6e45d952) (0)
# 15.09 [+8.92] # ipv4: Test failed
# 15.10 [+0.00] #          FAIL  tun_vnet_hash.ipv4
# 15.10 [+0.00] not ok 15 tun_vnet_hash.ipv4
# 15.10 [+0.00] #  RUN           tun_vnet_hash.tcpv4 ...
# 15.36 [+0.26] # tun.c:689:tcpv4:Expected 0 (0) != tun_vnet_hash_check(self->source_fd, self->dest_fds, &packet, sizeof(packet), VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID, VIRTIO_NET_HASH_REPORT_TCPv4, 0xfb63539a) (0)
# 24.76 [+9.40] # tcpv4: Test failed
# 24.76 [+0.00] #          FAIL  tun_vnet_hash.tcpv4
# 24.76 [+0.00] not ok 16 tun_vnet_hash.tcpv4
# 24.77 [+0.00] #  RUN           tun_vnet_hash.udpv4 ...
# 25.05 [+0.28] # tun.c:710:udpv4:Expected 0 (0) != tun_vnet_hash_check(self->source_fd, self->dest_fds, &packet, sizeof(packet), VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID, VIRTIO_NET_HASH_REPORT_UDPv4, 0xfb63539a) (0)
# 32.11 [+7.06] # udpv4: Test failed
# 32.11 [+0.00] #          FAIL  tun_vnet_hash.udpv4
# 32.11 [+0.00] not ok 17 tun_vnet_hash.udpv4

I cannot reproduce the failure. What commit did you apply this patch series on? What architecture did the kernel run on?




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux