On Thu, Feb 27, 2025, Jon Kohler wrote: > > On Feb 27, 2025, at 2:34 PM, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> LGTM, but any chance we could hold this until I get the MBEC RFC out? > > > > No? It's definitely landing before the MBEC support, and IOM it works quite nicely > > with the MBEC support (my diff at the bottom). I don't see any reason to delay > > or change this cleanup. > > Ok no problem at all, happy to rebase on top of this when it lands. FWIW, you don't have to wait for this to land to send your RFC. You could send your RFC as-is; obviously I'd point out the conflict, but (a) it's an RFC and (b) generally it's not your responsibility to anticipate conflicts. Alternatively, and probably better in this case, would be include these patches in your RFC, with a short message in the cover letter explaining their existence. That said, I'm guessing I'll beat you to the punch and get this landed in kvm-x86 next before you send the RFC :-)
