Sorry, didn't have time to actually read this patch, but after a quick glance... On 02/26, Christian Brauner wrote: > > @@ -3949,7 +3955,7 @@ static int proc_task_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx) > tid = (int)(intptr_t)file->private_data; > file->private_data = NULL; > for (task = first_tid(proc_pid(inode), tid, ctx->pos - 2, ns); > - task; > + task && !(task->flags & PF_USER_WORKER); unless I am totally confused this looks "obviously wrong". proc_task_readdir() should not stop if it sees a PF_USER_WORKER task, this check should go into first_tid/next_tid. Oleg.
