On Tue, Feb 18, 2025, Xin Li wrote: > On 9/30/2024 10:00 PM, Xin Li (Intel) wrote: > While I'm waiting for the CET patches for native Linux and KVM to be > upstreamed, do you think if it's worth it for you to take the cleanup > and some of the preparation patches first? Yes, definitely. I'll go through the series and see what I can grab now. Thanks! > Top of my mind are: > KVM: x86: Use a dedicated flow for queueing re-injected exceptions > KVM: VMX: Don't modify guest XFD_ERR if CR0.TS=1 > KVM: VMX: Pass XFD_ERR as pseudo-payload when injecting #NM > KVM: nVMX: Add a prerequisite to existence of VMCS fields > KVM: nVMX: Add a prerequisite to SHADOW_FIELD_R[OW] macros > > Then specially, the nested exception tracking patch seems a good one as > Chao Gao suggested to decouple the nested tracking from FRED: > KVM: VMX: Virtualize nested exception tracking > > Lastly the patches to add support for the secondary VM exit controls might > go in early as well: > KVM: VMX: Add support for the secondary VM exit controls > KVM: nVMX: Add support for the secondary VM exit controls > > But if you don't like the idea please just let me know. > > Thanks! > Xin
