On 2/18/25 19:27, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Drop the local "kick" variable and the unnecessary "fallthrough" logic
> from sev_snp_ap_creation(), and simply pivot on the request when deciding
> whether or not to immediate force a state update on the target vCPU.
>
> No functional change intended.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 15 +++++----------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 8425198c5204..7f6c8fedb235 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -3940,7 +3940,6 @@ static int sev_snp_ap_creation(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> struct vcpu_svm *target_svm;
> unsigned int request;
> unsigned int apic_id;
> - bool kick;
> int ret;
>
> request = lower_32_bits(svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1);
> @@ -3958,18 +3957,10 @@ static int sev_snp_ap_creation(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>
> target_svm = to_svm(target_vcpu);
>
> - /*
> - * The target vCPU is valid, so the vCPU will be kicked unless the
> - * request is for CREATE_ON_INIT.
> - */
> - kick = true;
> -
> mutex_lock(&target_svm->sev_es.snp_vmsa_mutex);
>
> switch (request) {
> case SVM_VMGEXIT_AP_CREATE_ON_INIT:
> - kick = false;
> - fallthrough;
> case SVM_VMGEXIT_AP_CREATE:
> if (vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] != sev->vmsa_features) {
> vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "vmgexit: mismatched AP sev_features [%#lx] != [%#llx] from guest\n",
> @@ -4014,7 +4005,11 @@ static int sev_snp_ap_creation(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>
> target_svm->sev_es.snp_ap_waiting_for_reset = true;
>
> - if (kick) {
> + /*
> + * Unless Creation is deferred until INIT, signal the vCPU to update
> + * its state.
> + */
> + if (request != SVM_VMGEXIT_AP_CREATE_ON_INIT) {
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_UPDATE_PROTECTED_GUEST_STATE, target_vcpu);
> kvm_vcpu_kick(target_vcpu);
> }
