Re: [PATCH V2 02/12] KVM: x86: Allow the use of kvm_load_host_xsave_state() with guest_state_protected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/29/2025 5:58 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>

Allow the use of kvm_load_host_xsave_state() with
vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected == true. This will allow TDX to reuse
kvm_load_host_xsave_state() instead of creating its own version.

For consistency, amend kvm_load_guest_xsave_state() also.

Ensure that guest state that kvm_load_host_xsave_state() depends upon,
such as MSR_IA32_XSS, cannot be changed by user space, if
guest_state_protected.

[Adrian: wrote commit message]

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z2GiQS_RmYeHU09L@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
---
TD vcpu enter/exit v2:
  - New patch
---
  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c |  7 +++++--
  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c     | 18 +++++++++++-------
  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 7640a84e554a..b4bcfe15ad5e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -4253,7 +4253,9 @@ static __no_kcsan fastpath_t svm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  		svm_set_dr6(svm, DR6_ACTIVE_LOW);
clgi();
-	kvm_load_guest_xsave_state(vcpu);
+
+	if (!vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
+		kvm_load_guest_xsave_state(vcpu);
kvm_wait_lapic_expire(vcpu); @@ -4282,7 +4284,8 @@ static __no_kcsan fastpath_t svm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  	if (unlikely(svm->vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_NMI))
  		kvm_before_interrupt(vcpu, KVM_HANDLING_NMI);
- kvm_load_host_xsave_state(vcpu);
+	if (!vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
+		kvm_load_host_xsave_state(vcpu);
  	stgi();
/* Any pending NMI will happen here */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index bbb6b7f40b3a..5cf9f023fd4b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1169,11 +1169,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_lmsw);
void kvm_load_guest_xsave_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  {
-	if (vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
-		return;
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected);
if (kvm_is_cr4_bit_set(vcpu, X86_CR4_OSXSAVE)) {
-
  		if (vcpu->arch.xcr0 != kvm_host.xcr0)
  			xsetbv(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK, vcpu->arch.xcr0);
@@ -1192,13 +1190,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_load_guest_xsave_state); void kvm_load_host_xsave_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  {
-	if (vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
-		return;
-
  	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_PKU) &&
  	    ((vcpu->arch.xcr0 & XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU) ||
  	     kvm_is_cr4_bit_set(vcpu, X86_CR4_PKE))) {
-		vcpu->arch.pkru = rdpkru();
+		if (!vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
+			vcpu->arch.pkru = rdpkru();

this needs justification.

  		if (vcpu->arch.pkru != vcpu->arch.host_pkru)
  			wrpkru(vcpu->arch.host_pkru);
  	}


@@ -3916,6 +3912,10 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
  		if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
  		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES))
  			return 1;
+
+		if (vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
+			return 1;
+

this and below change need to be a separate patch. So that we can discuss independently.

I see no reason to make MSR_IA32_XSS special than other MSRs. When guest_state_protected, most of the MSRs that aren't emulated by KVM are inaccessible by KVM.

  		/*
  		 * KVM supports exposing PT to the guest, but does not support
  		 * IA32_XSS[bit 8]. Guests have to use RDMSR/WRMSR rather than
@@ -4375,6 +4375,10 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
  		if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
  		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES))
  			return 1;
+
+		if (vcpu->arch.guest_state_protected)
+			return 1;
+
  		msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.ia32_xss;
  		break;
  	case MSR_K7_CLK_CTL:





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux