On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 09:47:56PM -0800, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> Thanks for the context, didn't realize a manual backport was needed.
Feb 17 gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (:9.1K|) FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/cpu/kvm: SRSO: Fix possible missing IBPB on VM-Exit" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
Feb 17 gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (:9.1K|) FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/cpu/kvm: SRSO: Fix possible missing IBPB on VM-Exit" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Feb 17 gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (:9.1K|) FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/cpu/kvm: SRSO: Fix possible missing IBPB on VM-Exit" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Feb 17 gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (:9.2K|) FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/cpu/kvm: SRSO: Fix possible missing IBPB on VM-Exit" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Feb 17 gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (:9.5K|) FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/cpu/kvm: SRSO: Fix possible missing IBPB on VM-Exit" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
