On Sat, Feb 08, 2025, Yan Zhao wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 07:07:06AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025, Yan Zhao wrote: > > > Make sure pfn is not changed for a spurious fault by warning in the TDP > > > MMU. For shadow path, only treat a prefetch fault as spurious when pfn is > > > not changed, since the rmap removal and add are required when pfn is > > > changed. > > > > I like sanity checks, but I don't like special casing "prefetch" faults like this. > > KVM should _never_ change the PFN of a shadow-present SPTE. The TDP MMU already > > BUG()s on this, and mmu_spte_update() WARNs on the transition. > However, both TDP MMU and mmu_set_spte() return RET_PF_SPURIOUS directly before > the BUG() in TDP MMU or mmu_spte_update() could be hit. Ah, that's very different than treating a prefetch fault as !spurious though. I would be a-ok with this: if (is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte) && (fault->prefetch || is_access_allowed(fault, iter->old_spte)) && is_last_spte(iter->old_spte, iter->level)) { WARN_ON_ONCE(fault->pfn != spte_to_pfn(iter->old_spte)); return RET_PF_SPURIOUS; }