Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/9] abstract kvm x86 mmu->n_free_mmu_pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/15/2010 04:55 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
First of all, I think "free" is a poor name for this value.  In
this context, it means, "the number of mmu pages which this kvm
instance should be able to allocate."  To me, "free" implies
much more that the objects are there and ready for use.  I think
"available" is a much better description, especially when you
see how it is calculated.


Agreed. Note that if reclaim is improved, we can drop it completely and let the kernel trim the cache when it grows too large.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux