On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 09:33:12AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:14:02PM -0600, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 04:42:00PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 03:52:31PM -0600, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > > vfio_pci_ioctl_get_pci_hot_reset_info checks if either the vdev's slot > > > > or bus is not resettable by calling pci_probe_reset_{slot,bus}. Those > > > > functions in turn call pci_{slot,bus}_resettable() to see if the PCI > > > > device supports reset. > > > > > > This change makes sense to me, but.. > > > > > > > However, commit d88f521da3ef ("PCI: Allow userspace to query and set > > > > device reset mechanism") added support for userspace to disable reset of > > > > specific PCI devices (by echo'ing "" into reset_method) and > > > > pci_{slot,bus}_resettable methods do not check pci_reset_supported() to > > > > see if userspace has disabled reset. Therefore, if an administrator > > > > disables PCI reset of a specific device, but then uses vfio-pci with > > > > that device (e.g. with qemu), vfio-pci will happily end up issuing a > > > > reset to that device. > > > > > > How does vfio-pci endup issuing a reset? It looked like all the paths > > > are blocked in the pci core with pci_reset_supported()? Is there also > > > a path that vfio is calling that is missing a pci_reset_supported() > > > check? If yes that should probably be fixed in another patch. > > > > This is the path I observed: > > You didn't answer the question, I didn't ask about pci_probe_*() I > asked why doesn't pci_reset_supported() directly block the actual > reset? Sorry, I misunderstood your question. __pci_reset_bus() -> pci_bus_reset(..., PCI_RESET_PROBE) -> pci_bus_resettable() __pci_reset_slot() -> pci_slot_reset(..., PCI_RESET_PROBE) -> pci_slot_resettable() pci_reset_bus() -> pci_probe_reset_slot() -> pci_slot_reset(..., PCI_RESET_PROBE) -> pci_bus_resettable() if true: __pci_reset_slot() else: __pci_reset_bus() Before my change, both call paths would end up calling pci_slot_resettable() and not checking the sysfs file-contents. Please let me know if that addresses your concern, I think my changes fixes the paths you are talking about as well. If I need to clarify this in the commit message, I can. -Nish