On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 12:07:00PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 1:53 AM Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > For the first, hmm, a bad thing is that though > > tdh_mem_sept_add()/tdh_mem_page_aug()/tdh_mem_sept_add() all need to handle > > TDX_OPERAND_BUSY, the one for tdh_mem_page_aug() has already been squashed > > into the MMU part 2. > > > > If you like, maybe I can extract the one for tdh_mem_page_aug() and merge it > > with 1+5. > > That works for me, but if it's easier for you to merge the fixups in > the respective base patches that's okay too. Then I'll merge them into the respective base patches to save effort and make the latter cleaner :) Thank you, Paolo!
