We should probably... On Mon, 2025-01-13 at 10:09 +0800, Yan Zhao wrote: > KVM: TDX: Return -EBUSY when tdh_mem_page_add() encounters > TDX_OPERAND_BUSY Squash this in "KVM: TDX: Add an ioctl to create initial guest memory" in kvm-coco-queue. > KVM: x86/mmu: Return RET_PF* instead of 1 in kvm_mmu_page_fault() Recommend this to go through kvm/x86 tree separately? > KVM: TDX: Retry locally in TDX EPT violation handler on RET_PF_RETRY > KVM: TDX: Kick off vCPUs when SEAMCALL is busy during TD page removal Include these in kvm-coco-queue and drop "x86/virt/tdx: Retry seamcall when TDX_OPERAND_BUSY with operand SEPT" > fixup! KVM: TDX: Implement hooks to propagate changes of TDP MMU > mirror page table > fixup! KVM: TDX: Implement hooks to propagate changes of TDP MMU > mirror page table Squash these into kvm-coco-queue. > fixup! KVM: TDX: Implement TDX vcpu enter/exit path Add this in the next version of "TDX vcpu enter/exit path". How does that sound?
