On 1/8/2025 11:22 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote: > On 1/7/25 12:34, Kalra, Ashish wrote: >> On 1/7/2025 10:42 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote: >>> On 1/3/25 14:01, Ashish Kalra wrote: >>>> From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@xxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Remove platform initialization of SEV/SNP from PSP driver probe time and >>> >>> Actually, you're not removing it, yet... >>> >>>> move it to KVM module load time so that KVM can do SEV/SNP platform >>>> initialization explicitly if it actually wants to use SEV/SNP >>>> functionality. >>>> >>>> With this patch, KVM will explicitly call into the PSP driver at load time >>>> to initialize SEV/SNP by default but this behavior can be altered with KVM >>>> module parameters to not do SEV/SNP platform initialization at module load >>>> time if required. Additionally SEV/SNP platform shutdown is invoked during >>>> KVM module unload time. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@xxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- >>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c >>>> index 943bd074a5d3..0dc8294582c6 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c >>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c >>>> @@ -444,7 +444,6 @@ static int __sev_guest_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp, >>>> if (ret) >>>> goto e_no_asid; >>>> >>>> - init_args.probe = false; >>>> ret = sev_platform_init(&init_args); >>>> if (ret) >>>> goto e_free; >>>> @@ -2953,6 +2952,7 @@ void __init sev_set_cpu_caps(void) >>>> void __init sev_hardware_setup(void) >>>> { >>>> unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx, sev_asid_count, sev_es_asid_count; >>>> + struct sev_platform_init_args init_args = {0}; >>> >>> Will this cause issues if KVM is built-in and INIT_EX is being used >>> (init_ex_path ccp parameter)? The probe parameter is used for >>> initialization done before the filesystem is available. >>> >> >> Yes, this will cause issues if KVM is builtin and INIT_EX is being used, >> but my question is how will INIT_EX be used when we move SEV INIT >> to KVM ? >> >> If we continue to use the probe field here and also continue to support >> psp_init_on_probe module parameter for CCP, how will SEV INIT_EX be >> invoked ? >> >> How is SEV INIT_EX invoked in PSP driver currently if psp_init_on_probe >> parameter is set to false ? >> >> The KVM path to invoke sev_platform_init() when a SEV VM is being launched >> cannot be used because QEMU checks for SEV to be initialized before >> invoking this code path to launch the guest. > > Qemu only requires that for an SEV-ES guest. I was able to use the > init_ex_path=/root/... and psp_init_on_probe=0 to successfully delay SEV > INIT_EX and launch an SEV guest. > Thanks Tom, i will make sure that we continue to support both the probe field and psp_init_on_probe module parameter for CCP modules as part of v4. >> >>> Thanks, >>> Tom >>> >>>> bool sev_snp_supported = false; >>>> bool sev_es_supported = false; >>>> bool sev_supported = false; >>>> @@ -3069,6 +3069,16 @@ void __init sev_hardware_setup(void) >>>> sev_supported_vmsa_features = 0; >>>> if (sev_es_debug_swap_enabled) >>>> sev_supported_vmsa_features |= SVM_SEV_FEAT_DEBUG_SWAP; >>>> + >>>> + if (!sev_enabled) >>>> + return; >>>> + >>>> + /* >>>> + * NOTE: Always do SNP INIT regardless of sev_snp_supported >>>> + * as SNP INIT has to be done to launch legacy SEV/SEV-ES >>>> + * VMs in case SNP is enabled system-wide. >>>> + */ >>>> + sev_platform_init(&init_args); >>>> } >>>> >>>> void sev_hardware_unsetup(void) >>>> @@ -3084,6 +3094,9 @@ void sev_hardware_unsetup(void) >>>> >>>> misc_cg_set_capacity(MISC_CG_RES_SEV, 0); >>>> misc_cg_set_capacity(MISC_CG_RES_SEV_ES, 0); >>>> + >>>> + /* Do SEV and SNP Shutdown */ >>>> + sev_platform_shutdown(); >>>> } >>>> >>>> int sev_cpu_init(struct svm_cpu_data *sd) >>