From: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fixup the uc_attr_mem_limit test case to also cover the KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR ioctl. Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Hariharan Mari <hari55@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241216092140.329196-7-schlameuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <20241216092140.329196-7-schlameuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c index 8f306395696e..135ee22856cf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c @@ -210,10 +210,13 @@ TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_attr_mem_limit) struct kvm_device_attr attr = { .group = KVM_S390_VM_MEM_CTRL, .attr = KVM_S390_VM_MEM_LIMIT_SIZE, - .addr = (unsigned long)&limit, + .addr = (u64)&limit, }; int rc; + rc = ioctl(self->vm_fd, KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR, &attr); + EXPECT_EQ(0, rc); + rc = ioctl(self->vm_fd, KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR, &attr); EXPECT_EQ(0, rc); EXPECT_EQ(~0UL, limit); -- 2.47.1
