On 1/8/2025 1:52 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 10:50:13AM +0530, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote: > And your patch doesn't have that at all. I know Sean thinks it is a good idea > and perhaps it is but without proper justification and acks from the other > guest type maintainers, I simply won't take such a patch(-set). I haven't heard anything from other guest type maintainers yet, and they are on CC from v12 onward. > And even if it is good, you need to solve it another way - not with this > delayed-work hackery. > > IOW, this switching the paravirt clock crap to use TSC when the TSC is this > and that and the HV tells you so, should be a wholly separate patchset with > reviews and acks and the usual shebang. I agree, we should handle this as a separate patch series. > If you want to take care only of STSC now, I'd take a patch which is known > good and tested properly. And that should happen very soon because the merge > window is closing in. In that case, let me limit this only to STSC for now, i will send updated patch. Regards, Nikunj
