On 2024-12-16 10:21, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
Fixup the uc_attr_mem_limit test case to also cover the
KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR ioctl.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Hariharan Mari <hari55@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
index ef3e391811b3..087496fe264d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
@@ -206,10 +206,13 @@ TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_attr_mem_limit)
struct kvm_device_attr attr = {
.group = KVM_S390_VM_MEM_CTRL,
.attr = KVM_S390_VM_MEM_LIMIT_SIZE,
- .addr = (unsigned long)&limit,
+ .addr = (u64)&limit,
};
int rc;
+ rc = ioctl(self->vm_fd, KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR, &attr);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, rc);
+
rc = ioctl(self->vm_fd, KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR, &attr);
EXPECT_EQ(0, rc);
EXPECT_EQ(~0UL, limit);
