Re: [PATCH 12/15] KVM: x86: Track possible passthrough MSRs in kvm_x86_ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 05, 2024, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 11:47:33AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > It applies cleanly on my tree (github.com/kvm-x86/linux.git next)
> 
> Could it be that you changed things in the meantime?

Nope, I double checked that I'm using the same base.
 
> (Very similar result on Paolo's next branch.)
> 
> $ git log -1
> commit c55f6b8a2441b20ef12e4b35d4888a22299ddc90 (HEAD -> refs/heads/kvm-next, tag: refs/tags/kvm-x86-next-2024.11.04, refs/remotes/kvm-x86/next)
> Merge: f29af315c943 bc17fccb37c8
> Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Tue Nov 5 05:13:01 2024 +0000
> 
>     Merge branch 'vmx'
>     
>     * vmx:
>       KVM: VMX: Remove the unused variable "gpa" in __invept()
> 
> 
> $ patch -p1 --dry-run -i /tmp/0001-tmp.patch 
> checking file arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h
> checking file arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h

Are you trying to apply this patch directly on kvm/next | kvm-x86/next?  This is
patch 12 of 15.

> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1817 (offset -2 lines).
> checking file arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> checking file arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] n
> Apply anyway? [n] y
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 79.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 756.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 831.
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 870.
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 907.
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 894 with fuzz 1 (offset -30 lines).
> Hunk #7 FAILED at 1002.
> Hunk #8 FAILED at 1020.
> Hunk #9 FAILED at 1103.
> Hunk #10 FAILED at 1121.
> Hunk #11 FAILED at 1309.
> Hunk #12 FAILED at 1330.
> Hunk #13 FAILED at 1456.
> Hunk #14 succeeded at 1455 (offset -35 lines).
> Hunk #15 succeeded at 1479 (offset -35 lines).
> Hunk #16 FAILED at 1555.
> Hunk #17 succeeded at 3220 (offset -40 lines).
> Hunk #18 FAILED at 4531.
> Hunk #19 succeeded at 5194 (offset -38 lines).
> Hunk #20 succeeded at 5352 (offset -38 lines).
> 14 out of 20 hunks FAILED
> checking file arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> checking file arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
> checking file arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 642 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 3943.
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 3985.
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 4086 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 7532 (offset 6 lines).
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 7812 (offset 6 lines).
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 7827 (offset 6 lines).
> 2 out of 8 hunks FAILED
> checking file arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> checking file arch/x86/kvm/vmx/x86_ops.h
> checking file arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 10837 (offset -3 lines).
> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux