Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86: remove HIGHMEM64G support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 4, 2024, at 14:29, Brian Gerst wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 5:34 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  - In the early days of x86-64 hardware, there was sometimes the need
>>    to run a 32-bit kernel to work around bugs in the hardware drivers,
>>    or in the syscall emulation for 32-bit userspace. This likely still
>>    works but there should never be a need for this any more.
>>
>> Removing this also drops the need for PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT and SWIOTLB.
>> PAE mode is still required to get access to the 'NX' bit on Atom
>> 'Pentium M' and 'Core Duo' CPUs.
>
> 8GB of memory is still useful for 32-bit guest VMs.

Can you give some more background on this?

It's clear that one can run a virtual machine this way and it
currently works, but are you able to construct a case where this
is a good idea, compared to running the same userspace with a
64-bit kernel?


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux